Talk:DanTDM

(Redirected from Talk:Dan Middleton)
Latest comment: 16 days ago by DrOrinScrivello in topic Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2024

Change some things

edit

Change "5838 million." To "583.5 million". 2603:8081:8900:55FC:F4CB:DF8C:6BF8:5293 (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page)."MoreTDM Channel-About". YouTube. Retrieved 22 May 2023.</ref>== Fix Punctuation in Notes ==


The notes section of Total Views (Combined) shows MoreTDM with 5838 million or 5.838 billion views when in fact MoreTDM has only, exactly, 583,518,298 channel views. The number should have a period between the 3 and the 5 to clearly show the correct number of views on MoreTDM. The last number should also be 5 instead of 8 if the number of views on the MoreTDM channel is rounded to the nearest hundred thousand.

24.180.22.223 (talk) 17:17, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

References

  Done Hyphenation Expert (talk) 18:57, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2023

edit

I want to change the outdated 27.7 million subs, views, likes, etc, to its dated version. DanTDM now has 28 million subs Bobux 69 (talk) 00:27, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Bobux 69 Updated, thank you. Strugglehouse (talk) 10:30, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2024

edit

Hopefully I'm doing this right. Anyways, it says "is an English YouTube and video game personality and author known for his video game commentaries." The "YouTube" is suppose to be YouTuber? Can anyone please fix this? The fixed text goes as follows:

Daniel Robert Middleton (born 8 November 1991), known professionally as DanTDM (formerly TheDiamondMinecart), is an English YouTuber and video game personality and author known for his video game commentaries.[1] His output has covered many video games including Minecraft, Roblox, Pokémon and Sonic the Hedgehog, along with other content. ErrorOliver (talk) 19:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done I've also removed "video game personality" altogether to fix the flow of the sentence. I think what was meant before was that he is a [Youtube and video game] personality, not that he is a Youtube and [video game personality], but that wasn't very clear. Tollens (talk) 19:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference TheSundayTimes2019 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

Recent channel content changes

edit

Recently Daniel has started uploading content not targeted for children, most of which dark horror games because of him wanting to "pursue his own interests more instead of the channel's". This can also be linked to his more frequent livestreams and less frequent uploads on the main channel. So, stating that his audience is mostly children is outdated and just invalid. It should be updated. GranularGuy41 (talk) 18:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lunchly?

edit

Should we include the Lunchly conflict with DanTDM, Logan Paul, and MrBeast? HiGuys69420 (talk) 19:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2024

edit

I think for the Lunchly part that Dan tweeted about, it'd be good to have a sic where he says "can't not", since can't is an abbreviation of cannot.

"What happened to YouTubers man.. I can't not [sic] say anything anymore. This is selling stuff for the sake of making money, simple. How does this benefit their fans? This is selling crap to kids who don't know better than to trust the people who are selling it to them. Do better." Toptier5stars (talk) 21:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: Unless I'm reading it wrong, he's essentially saying, "I can't continue staying quiet anymore". With that reading, though it's not the most grammatical way of getting his point across, it's not exactly wrong and doesn't warrant a [sic] tag. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 20:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
He might be saying that, I'm not sure. But essentially saying "I cannot not say anything anymore" is an unusual way of saying that he can't continue staying quiet. On the page for Sic, it says that unusual grammar would warrant a [sic], and Dan having unusual grammar here would warrant a [sic] for that part, since it might be a error on his end. Toptier5stars (talk) 20:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm worried that adding the tag makes it sound like we, in Wikipedia's voice, are saying he made a mistake, when I don't think it's clear that he did (despite it being "unusual grammar", as you say). I may be in the minority with that opinion, though, so I'm reopening this request so that other parties can weigh in. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 20:57, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
To me, "can't not X" feels pretty natural, while "cannot not X" doesn't (even though they are logically equivalent, but language isn't always logical as the saying goes). It seems pretty clear to me that the intended meaning is, "I can't continue staying quiet anymore," because he is speaking out publicly as opposed to not saying anything. So in this case I would personally think that a "[sic]" wouldn't be needed, although I do recognize that the language would seem unusual to some.
My proposal is to just pare down the quote to remove the phrase in question entirely. I don't think the full tweet is necessary to get the point across. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 23:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
A very good point, so I went ahead and trimmed the confusing wording out of the quote. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 00:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply