Talk:Dante Giacosa

Serious errors in Reference 3

Reference 3, as it is at this time: http://www.fiat500usa.com/2009/02/dante-giacosa.html

The quotation may be correct, but the original article is very, very wrong in having a go at the Issigonis designs.

The transmission was integrated into the engine sump and shared the same oil supply. This is not a desirable feature for several reasons. First the difficulty and expense of manufacturing. Second , servicing is much more difficult, Thirdly, engines and transmissions like to use oils with different characteristics. And an automatic transmission would be nearly impossible.

Well, as it turned out, manufacture was not seriously difficult or expensive, servicing was straightforward, and there was an extremely successful automatic, many examples of which are still running to this day.

These cars also had a radiator fan driven by the engine with the subsequent radiator mounted in the right side fender well. This location was not ideal as it limits packaging alternatives.

Well, we see Mini, and its derivatives, mechanicals used in many specialist vehicles, including front and mid engined kit cars, so evidently the packaging limitations were not at all significant.

Dante Giacosa wanted to separate the engine and transmission to eliminate these problems, so with the 1964 Autobianchi Primula he did. Up until then, most front wheel drive cars had to have the engine and motor removed to change a clutch. This car was the production test bed for Fiat to try out their front wheel drive concept originating with them in 1947.

It is the Giacosa (and followers) layout that requires the engine and/or transmission to be removed from the vehicle for clutch replacement. It is NEVER necessary in the Issigonis layout, where the clutch is largely external to the engine/transmission assembly. Nor is it necessary in the other slightly later FWD implementation in the Triumph 1300, with fore and aft engine.

The referenced article is full of bias and should be identified as such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiger99 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Serious errors in Reference 3

Reference 3, as it is at this time: http://www.fiat500usa.com/2009/02/dante-giacosa.html

The quotation may be correct, but the original article is very, very wrong in having a go at the Issigonis designs.

The transmission was integrated into the engine sump and shared the same oil supply. This is not a desirable feature for several reasons. First the difficulty and expense of manufacturing. Second , servicing is much more difficult, Thirdly, engines and transmissions like to use oils with different characteristics. And an automatic transmission would be nearly impossible.

Well, as it turned out, manufacture was not seriously difficult or expensive, servicing was straightforward, and there was an extremely successful automatic, many examples of which are still running to this day.

These cars also had a radiator fan driven by the engine with the subsequent radiator mounted in the right side fender well. This location was not ideal as it limits packaging alternatives.

Well, we see Mini, and its derivatives, mechanicals used in many specialist vehicles, including front and mid engined kit cars, so evidently the packaging limitations were not at all significant.

Dante Giacosa wanted to separate the engine and transmission to eliminate these problems, so with the 1964 Autobianchi Primula he did. Up until then, most front wheel drive cars had to have the engine and motor removed to change a clutch. This car was the production test bed for Fiat to try out their front wheel drive concept originating with them in 1947.

It is the Giacosa (and followers) layout that requires the engine and/or transmission to be removed from the vehicle for clutch replacement. It is NEVER necessary in the Issigonis layout, where the clutch is largely external to the engine/transmission assembly. Nor is it necessary in the other slightly later FWD implementation in the Triumph 1300, with fore and aft engine.

The referenced article is full of bias and should be identified as such. Tiger99 (talk) 17:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dante Giacosa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140408211929/http://www.classicandperformancecar.com/front_website/octane_interact/carspecs.php/?see=3994 to http://www.classicandperformancecar.com/front_website/octane_interact/carspecs.php/?see=3994

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)