Talk:Darwin glass

	Australia portal Darwin glass is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Darwin glass is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Glass Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Huh?

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Impact material is hardly a glass project item - unless it includes non man made geological products - hope you have english - and have read the article when you add something like that Satu Suro 22:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dodgy maths

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article contains several conversion errors, eg.

250 metres = 155.34 miles
410 sq km = 158.3 miles squared

Can someone with the right conv algorithms please fix this (and any others) Downsize43 (talk) 09:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

The area was right, but too precise, but I have removed the other imperial units, this is in a metric country. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic