(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2] and
As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of (if such appeared in the article) using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day. Done
The first paragraph of 'Early life' contains one reference. Done
Please change the format of the references from this:
<ref>{{cite book
| isbn = 9781118252307
| year = 2011
| author = David Meerman Scott
| publisher = John Wiley & Sons Inc
| location = Hoboken, N.J.
| title = Newsjacking: How to inject your ideas into a breaking news story and generate tons of media coverage
| url = http://www.webinknow.com/2011/11/newsjacking.html
| edition = [[Mobipocket]]
}}</ref>
To this: <ref>{{cite book| isbn = 9781118252307| year = 2011| author = David Meerman Scott| publisher = John Wiley & Sons Inc| location = Hoboken, N.J.| title = Newsjacking: How to inject your ideas into a breaking news story and generate tons of media coverage| url = http://www.webinknow.com/2011/11/newsjacking.html| edition = [[Mobipocket]]}}</ref>
Look at it in edit mode to see the difference. Done
Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)
The reviewer has no notes here.
Pass
(c) (original research)
The reviewer has no notes here.
Pass
Broad in its coverage:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (major aspects)
Please create a section called 'Private life' to deal with his private life and 'Hobbies'. Done
Pass
(b) (focused)
Remove the section 'Twitter town hall at the White House'. It does not belong here. Done
If you want to keep it, then give only one line about it and end of story.
"Scott is very active on selected social media sites: Facebook,[48] Twitter,[49] and Google Plus.[50] For example, on July 6th, 2011 Twitter hosted an online town hall at the White House[51] where President Obama answered selected questions from members of Twitter. Scott's question[52] was the second one of only twenty selected from over 119,000 tweets.[53][54][55] Given the large number of social media sites and the investment of time to update each, he follows his own recommendation to focus on a few relevant sites, foregoing LinkedIn in his case for example.[56]" All that does not belong in 'Publications'. It is not about his publications. Done
Pass
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
The reviewer has no notes here.
Pass
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
The reviewer has no notes here.
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
The reviewer has no notes here.
Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)
The caption on the picture in the infobox needs to have the year in it. For example: 'David Meerman Scott in YYYY'. Done
Added year to photo caption, created Personal life section, merged Whitehouse Town hall into Publications (print and online) section Woz2 (talk) 20:22, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Re: Your request for removing the link breaks between cite attributes: I find the line breaks help readability so I'd like to leave them per MOS:STABILITY "Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a substantial reason." Thanks! Woz2 (talk) 22:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Re: "Add more links" - not sure what the issue is here... seems to me there a lot of links inbound and outbound already... Can you clarify? Woz2 (talk) 22:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
Done
Pass
On hold