Talk:David Shaffer
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David Shaffer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Possible Conflict-of-Interest declaration
editI am employed as a Research Scientist by the New York State Psychiatric Institute (NYSPI), at the Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC). As part of my duties, I work as an editor in the Department of Psychiatry in CUMC. The text I am contributing is biographical material about faculty members in the Department, whom I may know personally, as they are my colleagues. The material consists of biographical facts contained in the profiles of faculty members who appear on the Department's website. Faculty members have reviewed and approved the content I am submitting.
The material does not express a point of view or an opinion with respect to the profiles of the faculty. Rather, as noted above, it consists only of facts about the faculty. Psychiatry777 (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Glowing exaggerations and falsehoods. Yeah, I'm sure they did "review and approve" this homage. Why not mention the total lack of evidence that Shaffer's money-making "instruments" have any effect whatsoever on already low youth suicide rates? Why not mention Shaffer's huge income from pharmaceutical industry sources? Why not mention TeenScreen's laughable 16% positive predictive value? GH-1959 (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Critical inquiry
editI think this is an interesting starting point for a looking into the machinations of the psychiatric machine and its legally binding DSM. Obvious other entry points for inquiry are the DSM itself, but the NIMH-DISC is the application of it first as a paper algorithm, and then as a computer program. To make a long story short, the DISC is in the public domain as a product of the federal government, but apparently through Shaffer, this public domain information has been "annexed" (from Mumford) as a cash cow for Shaffer's associates at Columbia. There is absolutely no reason that it should not be available for free as a web site because it is simple math.--John Bessa (talk) 22:58, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David Shaffer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160309184508/http://teenscreen.org/ to http://www.teenscreen.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
It is improper to discuss a person's private medical condition in these pages. Iss246 (talk) 01:39, 18 March 2023 (UTC)