Talk:Delaware, Ontario

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Delaware, Ontario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070809003536/http://www.lowerthames-conservation.on.ca/SkaNahDoht.htm to http://www.lowerthames-conservation.on.ca/SkaNahDoht.htm/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070809003536/http://www.lowerthames-conservation.on.ca/SkaNahDoht.htm to http://www.lowerthames-conservation.on.ca/SkaNahDoht.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Sources

@Ian.thomson and P199: just wondering if any of you managed to identify the source of this copyvio section. I had been keeping an eye on it for some time but never flagged it because I couldn't identify the source. I figured it was A. Wellington's own work, which could still make it a copyvio but still I'd like to locate the source if it is in fact published. I'm also curious what inspired the editor to suddenly delete all of their work, but maybe we'll never know. Cheers. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:07, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

The entire thing didn't match, but a number of matches came up for a (rather shoddy) real estate site. Doing more investigation, I can't guarantee that site didn't take the material from us.

Still, the material was completely unsourced original research and went into a lot of undue detail drawn from primary sources (which it failed to properly cite) like this. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC)