Talk:Delaware Route 62

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Imzadi1979 in topic GA Review
Good articleDelaware Route 62 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 10, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Delaware Route 62/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 16:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Dabs and ELs look good.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Looks good.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Looks good as well.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Given the length of this highway, the content could be padded slightly with the AADT and NHS information.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Rare to see otherwise in highway articles.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    I fixed the caption for you because it wasn't a full sentence, it didn't need a period.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    I'm passing, but still recommending that the above suggestion be implemented. Imzadi 1979  17:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply