Talk:2011–2015 Myanmar political reforms
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2011–2015 Myanmar political reforms article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
grammar
editThis whole page could use a grammar workover. Seems like English is not the first language of the primary contributors.
Proposed move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to 2011–2012 Burmese political reforms. (non-admin closure) Jenks24 (talk) 12:12, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Reforms in Burma → Something better – This title is needlessly vague... Democratic reforms in Burma? 2011–2012 Burmese political reform? Something... —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- I like 2011–2012 Burmese political reform. Shrigley (talk) 01:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- I like 2011–2012 Burmese political reform also, but suggest it be made plural; several different reforms are happening at once here (ceasefires, prisoner releases, democratic elections, etc.). Khazar (talk) 01:39, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- I like 2011–2012 Burmese political reforms. I also think it should be plural. SWHtalk 01:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 2011–15 Myanmar political reforms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0%2C8599%2C2064470%2C00.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121029143228/http://www.mmtimes.com/2012/news/612/news61209.html to http://www.mmtimes.com/2012/news/612/news61209.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130725183949/http://www.mmtimes.com/2012/news/613/news61309.html to http://www.mmtimes.com/2012/news/613/news61309.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/myanmar-law-allowing-labor-unions-and-strikes-comes-into-effect/2012/03/10/gIQAXaj72R_story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)