This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from Aral Sea; check La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from MS Estonia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greenland, a WikiProject related to the nation of Greenland. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.GreenlandWikipedia:WikiProject GreenlandTemplate:WikiProject GreenlandGreenland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles
It is requested that an image or photograph of Denmark Strait overflow be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in the following regions may be able to help:
Latest comment: 10 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Arrived here from waterfall, where a newly registered editor had added a new section that was similar to some of the text of this article. While I understand that some sources have termed the phenomenon described here a "waterfall", I have yet to see a reliable source that unequivocally does so. Three of the four refs provided (none of them inline) do not mention the words "waterfall" or "cataract"—and in fact do not really describe this specific phenomenon at all—and the fourth ref is a dead link. Our Denmark Strait article has an inline citation for its mention of the "waterfall", but the linked page is, like the ones here, only peripherally relevant. Undoubtedly, there are many natural wonders with which I'm unfamiliar, but unfortunately I don't have time to go delving into this in a big way. It seems to me that we really need at least one solid source to support (1) the general thrust of the article, (2) the name of the article (i.e., use of the word "cataract"), and (3) the notability of the topic. If these aren't forthcoming, I'd suggest that deletion may be in order. In the meantime, I have tagged the article ({{original research}} and {{refimprove}}. Rivertorch's Evil Twin (talk) 05:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
I think the academic and popular references added to this article since 2016 cement the subject's notability. However, the academic sources consistently call the feature an "overflow", and only a few popular sources call it a "waterfall". I don't see any evidence that either the *academic* or *common* use of the term "waterfall" usually applies to sea overflows. Rather, it appears to be a very minority popular-level definition. So, in this article and in the "waterfall" article, I think there only needs to be a single sentence mentioning this broader use of the term. Otherwise this should be discussed as just an overflow. Jess_Riedel (talk) 13:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have now re-named the page to "Denmark Strait overflow", adjusted the language appropriately, and moved the sentence comparing it to a waterfall to the end of the article.
Note: if you disagree with this change, please find evidence that undersea overflows are considered "waterfalls" in common usage. The only examples I can find seem to be websites using that unusual broad definition *exclusively* to describe this overflow, and they almost all justify that based on this Wikipedia article rather than primary or secondary sources. Jess_Riedel (talk) 14:25, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
