Talk:Nitratidesulfovibrio vulgaris
(Redirected from Talk:Desulfovibrio vulgaris)
Latest comment: 10 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Nitratidesulfovibrio vulgaris appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 December 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Wiki Education assignment: Microbial Ecology
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Catcog (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Thunderclaw2, Coolcells.
— Assignment last updated by Chrisp01 (talk) 02:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:26, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the sulfate-reducing bacteria Desulfovibrio vulgaris can remove toxic, heavy metals from the environment? Source: [Desulfovibrio vulgaris]
- Reviewed:
5x expanded by Catcog (talk). Self-nominated at 00:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Desulfovibrio vulgaris; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
No concerns about the article, nothing flagged on Earwig's Copyvio tool, 5x expanded as stated above, well-sourced. Just need the QPQ and a reliable source for the hook. Tails Wx 18:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Tails Wx: The nominator appears to be a WikiEd editor and has less than five nominations, so no QPQ was needed here. With that said, has the sourcing issue been addressed? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, no QPQ needed there. Whoops! Anyway, the source for the hook isn't mentioned here, but in the article, the DYK hook's source is this. Tails Wx 03:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Tails Wx: So is this good to go now or are there still unaddressed issues? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The source for the hook is mentioned in the article, I think that should be alright. Tails Wx 14:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Tails Wx: So is this good to go now or are there still unaddressed issues? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, no QPQ needed there. Whoops! Anyway, the source for the hook isn't mentioned here, but in the article, the DYK hook's source is this. Tails Wx 03:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Tails Wx: The nominator appears to be a WikiEd editor and has less than five nominations, so no QPQ was needed here. With that said, has the sourcing issue been addressed? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
