Talk:Donald McEachin
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the Main Page in the "In the news" section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from reliable news sources to include recent events. Notice date: 29 November 2022. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate. |
Update Needed
editThis article needs to be updated to reflect Donald McEachin's 2007 election to the Virginia Senate. --TommyBoy 04:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Nevermind, after conducting a further Internet search, I have determined that no update is needed. --TommyBoy 00:59, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Dead link
editDuring several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.sbe.virginia.gov/cms/Election_Information/Election_Results/Index.html}}
- In David Toscano on 2011-03-16 23:46:59, 404 Not Found
- In Delores McQuinn on 2011-03-17 06:15:26, 404 Not Found
- In Frank Wagner on 2011-03-19 12:37:16, 404 Not Found
- In Glenn Oder on 2011-03-22 07:22:22, 404 Not Found
- In Harvey Morgan on 2011-03-22 22:44:23, 404 Not Found
- In A. Donald McEachin on 2011-06-19 22:12:27, 404 Not Found
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Donald McEachin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070221170843/http://www.sbe.state.va.us/web_docs/election/results/2001/jun2001/June12/ to http://www2.sbe.state.va.us/web_docs/election/results/2001/jun2001/June12/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130813132134/http://www.sbe.virginia.gov/ElectionResults/2005/Junr2005Primary/index.htm to http://www.sbe.virginia.gov/ElectionResults/2005/Junr2005Primary/index.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121228235514/http://www.sbe.virginia.gov/ElectionResults/2005/nov2005/html/h_74.htm to http://www.sbe.virginia.gov/ElectionResults/2005/nov2005/html/h_74.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002102634/https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/Data/2007/FF531BB4-AA39-4797-9CCE-21999D9EC84D/official/7_s.shtml to https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/Data/2007/FF531BB4-AA39-4797-9CCE-21999D9EC84D/official/7_s.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002101836/https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/DATA/2007/196E44FA-8B19-4240-9A44-737216DAA55D/Unofficial/7_s.shtml to https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/DATA/2007/196E44FA-8B19-4240-9A44-737216DAA55D/Unofficial/7_s.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Donald McEachin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130109190013/http://apps.lis.virginia.gov/sfb1/Senate/senatorwebprofile.aspx?id=210 to http://apps.lis.virginia.gov/sfb1/Senate/senatorwebprofile.aspx?id=210
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130708165741/https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/DATA/2011/EB178FD6-875D-4B0D-A295-900A0482F523/Official/7_s.shtml to https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/DATA/2011/EB178FD6-875D-4B0D-A295-900A0482F523/Official/7_s.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Politically charged attacks
editSo is anybody going to do something about all these politically charged attacks against McEachin on this page? These people editing the page to include them aren't really being subtle about it by saying stuff like Sic Semper Tyrannus and stuff like that. Even if it should remain, there's got to be a better way to frame it in a politically neutral/less charged way.