Talk:Drake's Drum

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Thomas Peardew in topic Encylopedic? My ..... foot !

Pictures

edit

Can someone add a piccy?

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Drake's Drum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

I heard about the drum from discussion on the BBC Radio 4 programme "The Rest Is History" discussing rumors, legends, truths, etc of the historical record with a historian on hand to verify issues. A whole segment of the show is devoted to the topic of the drum. The audio-only episode is limited to windows of access, so only periodically becomes available to hear, but does have a relatively dedicated page for when it does ever become accessible again: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b079mhls 72.182.148.220 (talk) 15:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Encylopedic? My ..... foot !

edit

This article is an almost perfect example of what a Wikipedia article ought not to be. Virtually no reputable sources, and the disreputable ones cited as if they were actually true. The right thing to do would be to delete two-thirds of it ..... but which two-thirds? Thomas Peardew (talk) 14:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply