Talk:Dushmun

Fair use rationale for Image:Dushman.jpg

Image:Dushman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dushman.jpg

Image:Dushman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

dushman (1972 film)

I suggest delete the article named dushmun as real article is dushman (1972 film). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrik88music (talk • contribs) 17:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

1971 or 1972?

Wasn't this film first released in 1971? Box Office India and IMDB sites both say 1971. More google hits for 1971 (though there are many for 1972). WP:FILMRELEASE says that first release date should be used. I don't think the article name should have been moved. BollyJeff | talk 13:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Requested move 3 April 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

---

Dushman (1972 film) → Dushman (1971 film) – Various relible sites related to films (for e.g. Box Office India, IMDB) claim that the film was released in 1971. Even references from several other news agencies such as Times of India indicate that the film was released in 1971 and not 1972. Vrishchik (talk) 05:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

• Support per nom. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
• Support per nomination and Lugnuts. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 17:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
• Support per above. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 17:52, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

• Support per nom. Tolly4bolly 23:27, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.