Talk:E Scow

(Redirected from Talk:E-Scow)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


The web page has been saved by the Internet Archive. Please consider linking to an appropriate archived version: [1]. --Stwalkerbot 23:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hull shapes

edit

The article references their hull shapes being similar but 10 feet shorter but doesn't make it clear which one is 10 feet shorter. The A-Scow is lighter so I assume that is it but if anyone has the specs it would be nice to clear that up! Cleanelephant (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on E-Scow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply