Talk:Easter Crisis
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Easter Crisis of 1920. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101125000024/http://kongehuset.dk/publish.php?dogtag=k_en_his_chrx to http://kongehuset.dk/publish.php?dogtag=k_en_his_chrx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 8 June 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved with the dab page moved to Easter Crisis (disambiguation) before deleting to keep the (deleted) edit history separate from the article's. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:47, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
– This move request is two steps in one request. I propose making the DAB page Easter Crisis into a redirect (i.e. not moving it elsewhere) to this page Easter Crisis of 1920, per WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. I then propose to move Easter Crisis of 1920 to Easter Crisis, per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:NOYEAR. The disambiguation page lists only the 1920 and the 1948 crises. Of these, the 1920 crisis is by far the most well-known, and what is typically referred to when one talk about the Easter Crisis (pageview comparison). In addition, the year is not necessary to identify the topic. As for the disambiguation between the 1920 and the 1948 crises, hatnotes on both pages are sufficient and consistent with WP:D2D. The last move of Easter Crisis of 1948 to 1948 Easter Crisis is just to make it consistent with WP:NCEVENTS (probably uncontroversial, but listed here for good measure). ― Hebsen (talk) 16:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: The original proposal from 7 June can be seen here. I changed it following comments from Dicklyon seen below. ― Hebsen (talk) 16:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
OpposeNeutral – the requested move is malformed, since the target is taken (by a disambig page). I'd say leave it. Disambiguation is a good thing. Dicklyon (talk) 02:51, 8 June 2020 (UTC)- Dicklyon So how should the request be made? I am proposing we delete the disambiguation page, as with only two entries, hatnotes are more effective. ― Hebsen (talk) 12:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Generally if your intended target page is taken, you make a multi-move proposal to say where to move it. Or if you mean to just overwrite it, say so explicitly (I guess you implied that by your hatnote mention). Currently your proposal is listed at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Possibly_incomplete_requests, which is why I noticed it. I don't know if there's a way to avoid that when proposing to just overwrite the target disambig page. I'll stay neutral. Dicklyon (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will try to fix the listing. ― Hebsen (talk) 15:50, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Generally if your intended target page is taken, you make a multi-move proposal to say where to move it. Or if you mean to just overwrite it, say so explicitly (I guess you implied that by your hatnote mention). Currently your proposal is listed at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Possibly_incomplete_requests, which is why I noticed it. I don't know if there's a way to avoid that when proposing to just overwrite the target disambig page. I'll stay neutral. Dicklyon (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Dicklyon So how should the request be made? I am proposing we delete the disambiguation page, as with only two entries, hatnotes are more effective. ― Hebsen (talk) 12:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.