Talk:Economic liberalisation in Pakistan

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Requested move 2 October 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Speedy moved, uncontroversial reversal of an undiscussed move by a sock (non-admin closure) – Thjarkur (talk) 18:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Economic Liberalization in Pakistan → Economic liberalisation in Pakistan – Because this article is written in Pakistani English given Strong national ties to the country, this article should be written according to Pakistani English convention per WP:ENGVAR, which almost all of them are similar to British spelling with local twist such as colour, realise, analyse, travelled, crore, etc. Both "ize" and "ise" are used in Pakistan and its Commonwealth of Nations countries but "ise" is predominant spelling in all these countries except in Canada, where "ize" is more dominant. This argument also applies before in Privatisation in Australia talk page, which originally titled "Privatization" then the article changed to "Privatisation" given that Australian spelling conventions that mostly similar to British counterpart (with exception of Program). In other side, "Economic Liberalization" seems be gramatically incorrect and the correct title should be "Economic liberalization" or "Economic liberalisation" because the second word (liberalization/liberalisation) should be lowercase after the first word. This article originally named as that (Economic liberalisation in Pakistan) before a sockpuppet named Sulaymān Hercules move the page to (Economic Liberalization in Pakistan), which it is incorrect title. 180.241.205.155 (talk) 13:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Support Obviously, not sure why it was moved without discussion in the first place blindlynx (talk) 14:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Support, per above. Mar4d (talk) 14:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Support. This seems non-controversial. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic