Talk:Edward Poynings

Poyning or Poynings?

Which is the correct spelling? The ROI named his Act "Poynings' Act 1495", and the Britannica also have his article under "Poynings". The vast majority of Google hits are also versions of this article. But can someone provide an authoritative answer, such as contemporary usage? Silverhelm 16:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC).

Poyning or Poynings?

It is absolutely and without a doubt Sir Edward Poynings. See the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography entry by Steven G. Ellis, ‘Poynings, Sir Edward (1459–1521)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 accessed 2 March 2008. As such, the law 10 Henry VII c. 9 should be, and generally is, described as Poynings' law. For examples see, R. D. Edwards and T. W. Moody, 'The history of Poynings' law, part I, 1494-1615', Irish Historical Studies, II (1940-41): 415-16 or C. I. McGrath The Making of the Eighteenth-Century Irish Constitution. Government, Parliament and the Revenue, 1692-1714 (Dublin, 2000). That said, it is listed as Poynings's law in the index of David Dickson, New Foundations: Ireland 1660-1800 (Dublin, 1987), 246.Sebrofs (talk) 19:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikiproject United Kingdom politics

Does this really belong in that wikiproject, the UK didn't even exist until 1707. Shouldn't it be in wikiproject England instead? --SeoirseIII (talk) 09:19, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

WP now removed.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edward Poynings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921053340/http://www.kateemersonhistoricals.com/TudorWomenW-Wh.htm to http://www.kateemersonhistoricals.com/TudorWomenW-Wh.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC)