Talk:El Satánico/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 14:30, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

• It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
• It contains copyright infringements -
• It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
• It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Prose

Lede

• Mexican luchador (professional wrestler) - WP:SEAOFBLUE... Do we need to link Mexican? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• trainer best known - some sort of punctuation s missing here. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• worked - quite an insider term, perhaps "performed" Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• rudo (known as a "heel" in English, the antagonists in professional wrestling). - can't we just link to heel, and explain? I don't think we need to mention an alternative name in the lede. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• playing the part of almost every wrestler - not sure what this means in terms of training. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• Why are some ring names bolded in the infobox? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

General

• It's been bugging me for a while, but why don't we have any prose at all to introduce Luchas de Apuestas? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• Some of the paras are really quite large, is there a suitable split? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• Some pipes to redirects such as Máscara Mágica and Los Guerreros del Infierno Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• Watch out for "Champion" as in "CMLL World Middleweight Champion" - the championship is the CMLL World Middleweight, so CMLL World Middleweight Champion is not a proper noun. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• MS-1 (wrestler) - remove the disambig! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

GA Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments

• I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}
  • Not much here, but the comments are above. I'll place on hold. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

• Lee Vilenski I think I have addressed all concerns? MPJ-DK (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2020 (UTC)