Talk:Electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Interesting article!
editI just made some small grammar corrections. As I am not familiar with the topic I would also welcome more images and also shorter sentences. But nice article, good structure, good job! --Nora Sistemich (talk) 14:51, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
add image
editIt's kind of difficult for the non-professionals or beginners to understand the concept of EQCM. Maybe adding some photos of this device to the schematic image could help people understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingbird92 (talk • contribs) 13:35, 17 July 2020 (UTC) --Qian Liu (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Requested move 17 July 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Uncontroversial request, even requested by article author, listed at WP:RM/TR (non-admin closure) – Thjarkur (talk) 17:53, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Electrochemical Quartz Crystal Microbalance → Electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance – fix capital letters Ruoha Zhao (talk) 08:36, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Observations and suggestions for improvements
editThe following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following expert review of the article within the Science, Tecnology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in June 2020.
Introduction: must be rewritten. Language appropriateness is poor.
EQCM calibration: quantities are introduced abruptly without proper definition. Fundamentals should be better described.
Applications of EQCM: examples are fine but not exhaustive.
References are fine.