Talk:E3 2012

Could we please get a redirect from E3 2012 to this page instead of Electronic Entertainment Expo 2012. It's really annoying to have to type it all out and every other E3 from previous years does this so please make it so for this page. 74.195.33.151 (talk) 02:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Zach

 Done –Fezmar9 (talk) 17:57, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Sonic All-Stars Racing Transformed

Can somebodey please make a page for the game thanks A Candela (talk) 23:00, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Lock Electronic Entertainment Expo 2012 page

Can someone please lock it becuse someone keeps puting Bullet Witch: Regenade up and it haven't been announced A Candela (talk) 23:17, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

SSB4

We need it announced at E3 this year. When else? We need a name. It's E3 2012 or never. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.34.63 (talk) 10:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

• It's already been announced but is not coming out any time soon so they didn't talk about it. STLocutus (talk) 17:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Rumours about PS4

There are rumours that PS4 will be on Electronic Entertainmennt Expo 2012 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_4#PlayStation_4 --82.139.5.13 (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

gamelist not shown allways

"List of notable games that may be exhibited" is only shown if I come to this page with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E3_2012 redirect. If I use url http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Entertainment_Expo_2012 that section is not shown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.248.244.9 (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

I removed those games from the list because they were speculative. They violated WP:CRYSTAL, which says that Wikipedia is not to be used for "crystal balling", or trying to predict future events, no matter how likely you think those events might be. There is a big difference between "may be exhibited" and "will be exhibited", and when the article is written properly, only the latter is shown - and each game will have an appropriate reference supporting its presence at the converntion. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 11:34, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 3 June 2012

Activision Blizzard under the games list should just say Activision - they are diff sectors and Activision Blizzard makes none of those games.

24.20.130.181 (talk) 16:50, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

 DoneAs this was possibly debatable I took a look at what the official exhibition site is choosing to call them, and IP is right. Egg Centric 14:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 6 June 2012

The status of e3 2012 should be ongoing

110.5.66.124 (talk) 06:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Not done: {{edit semi-protected}} is not required for edits to semi-protected, unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages. Mdann52 (talk) 15:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

THQ

Why is not WWE '13 in the THQ section? --189.216.220.124 (talk) 22:39, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Fire Emblem: Awakening

Why has Fire Emblem: Awakening been removed when it was shown at E3? DreamsDreams (talk) 12:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)DreamsDreams

Tank! Tank! Tank!

I realize the page says not to add remakes, ports, or otherwise enhanced versions of existing games (which unfortunately excludes the like of Persona 4: Golden and Zone of the Enders HD Collection, among others), but could an exception be made for Namco Bandai's upcoming Wii U game Tank! Tank! Tank!? Prior to the Wii U announcement, it was a relatively obscure game that only saw release in arcades, and it appears that none of the (few) sites covering this game have picked up on the fact that it was an arcade game. Even Namco's own press release doesn't mention this fact. Most only know this game in the context of the Wii U, and therefore I would ask that it be included, since for those who aren't well-versed in modern arcade gaming, it didn't exist until Nintendo's E3 conference. The Mach Turtle (talk) 14:27, 7 June 2012 (UTC)