Talk:Endless Love (song)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Heartfox in topic Undefined ref

|See also Talk:Endless Love (1981 song) and Talk:Endless Love (1994 single).}}


Clip

edit

Should we mention, that the song is also known from a widely distributed video clip featuring Pres. Bush and PM Blair in a mocked love duet :-) Medico80 07:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes I think you should

I've deleted that portion because it failed to meet any sort of notability criteria. Masquatto (talk) 11:42, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Diana-Ross-Endless-Love.jpg

edit
 

Image:Diana-Ross-Endless-Love.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Celebrity Big Brother 2009

edit

The verison should be place in here.--Cooly123 18:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooly123 (talkcontribs)

Content dispute

edit

I removed some unsourced and non-neutral information from the article about a month or so ago, but then an SPA reverted it without explanation. I then removed it again but then was reverted again with the allegation that I'm racist (and for the record, I'm black myself). Basically, the about the record section is non-neutral any way you look at it, but as far as the Billboard claim, all it really needs is a source to back it up (in addition, as far as this, the SPA should also understand that no one owns articles on Wikipedia). Erpert WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 18:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Endless Love (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Endless Love (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Endless Love (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Endless Love (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Undefined ref

edit

@Heartfox: please fill in a definition for the ref you named "MM029". -- Fyrael (talk) 20:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fixed, Heartfox (talk) 20:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply