Talk:Osek b'mitzvah patur min hamitzvah

WP:EN

What is the correct title of this article in English? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:44, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

12:40, 20 November 2011‎ In ictu oculi (talk | contribs)‎ m (225 bytes) (moved Talk:Osek b'mitzvah patur min hamitzvah to Talk:Engaged in one precept, exempt from another: per sources in article - no evidence that phrase exists in English) (undo)

Unexplained deletion of academic sources by editor before reverting page move

This editor has deleted academic sources added to the article, which, unintentionally no doubt, makes the move to English title signalled above and noted in edit summary look as though it wasn't supported by WP:RS and WP:UE. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:15, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Deafening silence..

So, do we restore these or not:

• Martin Sicker The Moral Maxims of the Sages of Israel: Pirkei Avot Page 83 - 2004 "Indeed, it was for this reason that the sages argued that one who was engaged in the performance of one precept was exempt from performing another at the same time
• Moses Maimonides Commentary to Mishnah Aboth 1968 "As a consequence of this principle they said: 10 One who is engaged in a precept is exempt from the [obligation to fulfill some other] precept; [this was taught in order that he proceed] without comparing the precept he is engaged in ..
• Gerald Friedlander Laws and customs of Israel: Volume 2; 1916 "One should not perform two precepts simultaneously lest he will not be able to give the necessary attention to both, therefore, one who is engaged in the performance of one precept is exempt (then) from the fulfilment of another.

In ictu oculi (talk) 13:28, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Based on In Ictu's poor presentation (cherry picking?) of sources supporting his attempted move of Talk:B'rov am hadrat melech (see the move request on the discussion page), I recommend that his presentation of sources here be taken with a grain of salt until someone else has had the time to check the sources independently with Google Book Search. - Lisa (talk - contribs) 16:56, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

How exactly does the above require that Friedlander, Maimonides, and Sicker WP:RS above remain deleted from this article stub? In ictu oculi (talk) 03:14, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

• Oppose move and keep article as is per Lisa. The problem is that In ictu has come along with motions for sweeping changes like this all over the place that has just engendered WP:DISRUPT and near WP:WAR more than anything else. More WP:CONSENSUS is required otherwise such suggested changes just amount to being railroaded into In ictu's WP:POV. So let's all ease up and make improvements to the articles' WP:CONTENT rather than quibble over headings that can easily be accommodated by WP:REDIRECTS! See Category:Hebrew words and phrases for thousands of instances where transliterated Hebrew language words are legitimately used in WP articles. IZAK (talk) 06:02, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Oppose what? There hasn't been an RM, there's just been a User deleting academic sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)