This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
As recently as May 13, 2016 in the International Tolerance Grades section, an example shaft tolerance of 10+0−0.009 was given. That seemed correct to me. Then it was changed, I thought accidentally, to 10+0+0.009 which seems incorrect to me. I changed it back and then on May 15 it was again changed to 10+0+0.009. It seems like you would want the shaft to be no bigger than the nominal size of 10 rather than +0 to +0.009 which I think means from at least exactly nominal size and up to +0.009, which I think would mean the shaft could be 0.009 bigger than the nominal size. It is stated in the example that the parts are to be assembled by hand. If the H7 hole was made the minimum tolerable size at exactly 10-0 and the h6 shaft was made at exactly maximum tolerable size of 10+0.009, then I think that would be an interference fit of almost a hundredth of a mm, and that would be a little tight for hand assembly. If I'm getting this wrong then please explain. Mindbuilder (talk) 06:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps this has to do with the incorrect indication in the table that is included as a picture. I think this table is incorrect.Robijn (talk) 14:48, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
why are there two sections with headings "International Tolerance grade". Stuck between there is a blurb about standard tolerance that seems unrelated to international tolerance..
Before i go clean it up i though id check if there is some logic to this org structure that i don't understand.
Gjxj (talk) 23:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
