Talk:Environment Oregon
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Environment Oregon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source doesn't back up assertion
editThis citation: Alan Bisbort, Hartford Advocate: February 26, 2004 doesn't appear to back up the fact it was referencing. Katr67 (talk) 06:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I used a biography this time. Its a better source anyway.
editAlso added an original labor section with citable info about the labor dispute. I even added a direct link to the actual lawsuit.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.53.254.70 (talk • contribs) 01:50, December 7, 2007
- That's better, though I'm going see if I can find a copy of the biography to double check, since your last reference didn't work out so well. Now some advice and food for thought: 1) How is a link to this lawsuit not "PR" vs. the things you've been removing from the various PIRG articles as PR? 2) Pick one log in, use it, and stay logged in. You're undermining your credibility by using several logins 3) Better sources for the lawsuit would be third-party sources such as national and large-circulation newspapers and magazines and the like. See WP:RS for more information. 4) I'll reiterate that Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Katr67 (talk) 02:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Recent Edits
editSomeone who claims to be a Director for the group made substantial changes without even logging in. I did not revert, but made edits only to eliminate POV. (It actually was a public relations stump without original wrighting, and some of that might still be there) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richprentice (talk • contribs) 23:45, February 11, 2008
Edits to page
editI edited Environment Oregon's page to reduce POV and ax-grinding that was unsubstantiated by any provided source material and appeared to include personal attacks. I have left the section edited, removing personal attacks and rumor, but have left simplified content with links to the sources where they could be verified and readers can use to receive more information. I did not remove any existing links, but removed one broken link to www.fundovertimelawsuit.com which no longer seems to be in operation. I also added content that updates readers as to the organization's current activities and campaigns. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dyanamason (talk) 23:19, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- I hope you read up on conflict of interest. Thanks. Valfontis (talk) 21:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
reducing donation
editwe are both retired and on fixed income. we are requesting our donation be reduced to 10 dollars a month from the 30. 10 was our original donation but as i say we feel comfortable going back to that. we can no longer do the 30 2601:1C0:5B00:2984:BC33:6424:86EE:EFD0 (talk) 20:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)