Talk:Behavioral epigenetics

(Redirected from Talk:Epigenetics and behaviour)
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Zenomonoz in topic Cleanup + sources

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2022 and 17 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yviannna (article contribs).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 8 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lydiaham.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

edit

  This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Wikipedia supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Possible updates and additions

edit

I am considering adding some research to this page including recent research on epigenetics as it relates to PTSD accelerated aging heart disease and more, and possibly a separate section on the intersection between epigenetics and criminology. I am looking to gauge what other editors think about this. Please let me know your thoughts on any problems or potential pitfalls. Thank you. TAA999 (talk) 18:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Senior Seminar

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2024 and 10 June 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): TAA999 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: TAA999.

— Assignment last updated by TAA999 (talk) 17:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup + sources

edit

This article is due to ac cleanup with it's over reliance on weak primary source studies.

These sources should be good to use, particularly the first:

Zenomonoz (talk) 23:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply