Talk:Epimetheus
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Epimetheus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ivan Illich and "The Rebirth of Epimethean Man"
editHere are some links to sources that address Illich's retelling of the myth: Ivan Illich in Conversation: The Testament of Ivan Illich, The Challenges of Ivan Illich: A Collective Reflection, and The Prophet of Cuernavaca: Ivan Illich and the Crisis of the West. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 15:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC) (edited 22:36, 18 April 2018 (UTC))
Requested move 18 April 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 19:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
– The clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC with respect to long-term significance and importance. The namesake of the moon. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support. The Titan gets 85 percent of relevant pageviews. Nine Zulu queens (talk) 03:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support - being the namesake to something else is a prime indication of its long-term significance. -- Netoholic @ 04:34, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support. Generally deities should be primary, as compared with moons, asteroids, craters, or flecks of dust named after them. P Aculeius (talk) 12:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support per above power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 09:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved paragraph here
editEpimetheus plays a key role in the philosophy of Bernard Stiegler, and in particular in terms of his understanding of the relation between technogenesis and anthropogenesis; according to Stiegler, it is significant that Epimetheus is entirely forgotten in the philosophy of Martin Heidegger.[further explanation needed]
The above should not be readded into the article without a more comprehensible explanation of what it means. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 17:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)