Talk:Eramosa Member

Consider a new title for the page.

I would suggest the title of the page be "Eramosa Member". The main reason is because there is a town of Eramosa, the Eramosa River as well as various companies including an Engineering Consulting firm and a Porcelain Tile company. Zigismon (talk) 21:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Other uses are covered on the DAB (Eramosa (disambiguation)) and it looks as if this one is the primary topic. If you think it needs moving and further discussion is needed, I suggest using the process described at WP:PCM to discuss a page move, after checking WP:TITLE. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 4 September 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 ^(talk) 00:37, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

---

Eramosa → Eramosa Member – The main reason is because there is a town of Eramosa, the Eramosa River as well as various companies including an Engineering Consulting firm and a Porcelain Tile company. It will also conform to the naming format for most geological formations. Zigismon (talk) 21:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

I agree, the term Eramosa should redirect to the town that the formation/member is named after, and the article should be called Eramosa Member or Eramosa Formation (whatever it is, I am not familiar with this unit). Jstuby (talk) 22:43, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.