Talk:Ethos Water

--Coler32 (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)this seems like a biased opinion on ethos water== Criticism == Where are the citations for the criticism? It seems just like someone pulled these out of thin air.156.56.203.57 19:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

WP:FOOD Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 09:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Criticism section, external links

I'm having a little trouble swallowing the criticism section. The only citation is for a comment by one particular individual who felt personally wronged by Ethos' marketing scheme, and I'm not sure that should be taken as representative of widespread criticism. Furthermore, the critic is a representative of an organization opposed to ALL bottled water, and not simply Ethos. As written, the criticm section reads more like an attack ad.

Additionally, I've gone ahead and removed the "Anti-Ethos Water campaign" and "Ethos Spoof Site" website links; the former is shameless rabble-rousing which does not belong in an encyclopedia, and the latter is simply unencyclopedic. I suspect one or two politically-minded individuals included that information here as an attempt to contribute to the campaign geared toward improving Starbucks' treatment of water shortage issues via increasing charitable contributions from Ethos purchases. I would remind them that this is an encyclopedia, not a pulpit. Thank you.Bistromathics (talk) 00:24, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

UPDATE: I went ahead and made a few edits myself to try to re-balance the criticism section.Bistromathics (talk) 17:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ethos Water. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011110231/http://www.nowtoronto.com/issues/2007-03-22/news_story4.php to http://www.nowtoronto.com/issues/2007-03-22/news_story4.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)