Talk:Eugene Chaplin
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Reasons for this article
editI know it might sound slightly silly for a beginner WP editor to ask this, but why does Eugene Chaplin have his own article? I'm possibly trying to rewrite most of the articles to do with the Chaplin family, and find it quite hard to understand why he has his own article. He is not a public figure, the only time he has received publicity was in conjunction of a small tribute he had made to his father for a Swiss film festival. Given that his siblings Jane and Annette Chaplin, who also seem to keep out of the public eye, quite sensibly do not have their own articles, what is the reasoning for having an Eugene Chaplin article as he is not really a public figure? I'm not trying to attack the person who created the article, but I am simply curious about what criteria it fits, it would help me edit it as well. Thank you :) TrueHeartSusie3 (talk) 21:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)TrueHeartSusie3
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Eugene Chaplin. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://mp3.box.sk/newsread.php?newsid=1428&pid=music&subject=music+%3A%3A+interview
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)