Talk:European Newspaper Publishers' Association

Untitled

Yes, this text is taken from the ENPA website - which, as an employee, I wrote myself. An email has been send to permissions stating that this text can be used.

The previous version I wrote was unjustifiably deleted, so this has been rewritten and I believe should be acceptable. It is very similar to the entry on the World Association of Newspapers.

If there are any issues please do not hesistate to write on this wall and inform me before deleting the article.

Summersso (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Because this article has been deleted once for being promotional, you really should not have re-created it without seeking help from more experienced editors. A better approach would have been to create it as a subpage of your user page first, User:Summersso/European Newspaper Publishers Association for example, and asked for it to be reviewed by other editors before posting to the mainspace. As it is you still have a massive COI and merely reposting the article in almost identical terms as the deleted article will obviously attract extra attention from new page patrollers. – ukexpat (talk) 15:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Here's some coverage of what others said about the Association, rather than what the Association says about itself. Suggest doing as ukexpat said, create a draft using reliable sources and not spam. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 16:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Please look at the user page I've created, edit it as you feel free and approve. I hope the copyright issue is resolved since I've send TWO emails now to permissions from an ENPA email address authorising the use of text which is currently also on the website. Summersso (talk) 07:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

The article is currently up for discussion, feel free to weigh in there. I don't agree with your bias against newspapers that Google happened to spider but the only way the article will be allowed to remain is if the claims made can be verified by reliable sources. Primary sources are generally not sufficient for these purposes. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 14:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on European Newspaper Publishers Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080504162824/http://www.wan-press.org:80/worldpresstrends/home.php to http://www.wan-press.org/worldpresstrends/home.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080608093110/http://www.coe.int:80/T/E/Human%5FRights/Media/ to http://www.coe.int/t/e/human_rights/media/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)