Talk:Everything's Eventual

Fair use rationale for Image:Everythings Eventual.jpg

Image:Everythings Eventual.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Everythings Eventual.jpg

Image:Everythings Eventual.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Article title

I believe that this article should be renamed Everything's Eventual, dropping the : 14 Dark Tales, since it's not even a subtitle but a descriptive line, used on other Stephen King books, like Hearts in Atlantis ("New Fiction"), and many other novels that state "A Novel" on the cover. None of these should be parts of the actual title. The problem is that unfortunately Everything's Eventual used to refer to the short story/novella of the same title before I moved it to Everything's Eventual (short story). Now the book's article can't be moved because there's still that redirect. How can we resolve this? Jmj713 (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Go to Wikipedia:Requested_moves and try requesting it there.--CyberGhostface (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 17:14, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Everything's Eventual: 14 Dark Tales → Everything's Eventual — The descriptive title "14 Dark Tales" is not part of the actual title of the book. Jmj713 (talk) 23:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

• Create move request for user from WP:RM. Keith D (talk) 18:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

• Support. Probably uncontroversial IMO. Andrewa (talk) 20:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

• Support as per Andrewa. ArdClose (talk) 21:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Everything's Eventual. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130507021516/http://thedeathofjackhamilton.com to http://www.thedeathofjackhamilton.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)