Talk:Expert Political Judgment

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Futures studies

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Requested move 16 June 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) ~SS49~ {talk} 00:27, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? → Expert Political Judgment – Per WP:SUBTITLE. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. b uidhe 11:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 08:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic