Talk:Republic F-84 Thunderjet
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Republic F-84 Thunderjet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The first image
editThe first image on the page is definitely NOT an F-84G (the Edwards AFB page from which it came is in error). The F-84G had a multi-framed canopy -- I can't see the tail number in the photo but it's probably an F-84E. - Emt147 Burninate! 23:20, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Assessment
editI have classified this as B for WP:MILHIST, as this project has it's own independent A-class review. Before submitting it, I would suggest the addition of citations to some sections, especially "development" and 'Korean War". Carom 16:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comments. This is among several articles I'm trying to bring up to FA level. The text is verified but I need to go back and add the actual citations. - Emt147 Burninate! 03:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
pressed-forged spars and ribs
editI believe the giant press used to make the spars and ribs for the F-84F's wings was made by the (defunct)Mesta machine tool company, based just outside of Pittsburgh, PA. 152.163.100.131 09:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Cite tags
editJust so no-one freaks out - the cite tags were added at the request of an editor during the course of an A-class review. If cites aren't added, the tags can be removed once the review is closed. Carom 17:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC) They are still excessive and in most cases, unnecessary. Bzuk 18:05 29 December 2006 (UTC).
YF-96 redirects here
editIs there a reason why YF-96 redirects to the F-84 page? If the YF-96 was a derivative or variant of the F-84, shouldn't that be mentioned in the article? Nibios 21:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- The YF-96 was the original designation for the F-84F Thunderstreak. The F-84F was originally part of this article until a few months ago. I thought I had changed all the relevant redirects, but I missed one! Thanks for catching that. - BillCJ 23:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Thunderwhat?
editI can find lines in the body text referring to Thunderjet, Thunderstreak, and Thunderscreech. I get the impression that different names were given to different models, but it isn't exactly clear which model had which name. For instance a reference is made to an E model Thunderstreak, but that is immediately followed by a reference to a G model Thunderjet. Would it be a good idea to add a magic decoder ring to the list of variants at the bottom of the article? Maybe including the model name along with the model number? Loren.wilton (talk) 07:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- The straight-wing F-84A-E and G models were called the Thunderjet. They should be the only models covered here now. The F-84F Thunderstreak and RF-84F Thunderflash are the swept-wing versions. The last version is the XF-84H Thunderscreech, an experimental turboprop version of the F-84F. The others models were also covered here until last year. They are listed in the introduction, under the variants (sewpt-wing), and under "Notable achievements" concerning the Thunderbirds. I don't find "Thunderstreak" mentioned outside of those contexts. - BillCJ (talk) 08:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
File:JRV Thunderjet.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:JRV Thunderjet.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:JRV Thunderjet.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC) |
a comment
editfrom the f84thunderjet.com site:
"the straight stuff" what you mean the "straight" stuff?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Executioners (talk • contribs) 18:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Republic F-84 Thunderjet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121202085325/http://www.museumofaviation.org/F84E.php to http://www.museumofaviation.org/F84E.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121007235604/http://www.hill.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5702 to http://www.hill.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5702
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
This incident with one F-84 shot down is currently missing in the article. I'd be grateful for someone familiar with the topic would include it - otherwise I'll do it myself, anywhen... --KnightMove (talk) 10:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)