Talk:Grumman F4F Wildcat
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grumman F4F Wildcat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Infobox
editI personally think that the info-box doesn't appear right in all browsers. The font is awfully small in my Opera. Someone might want to resize a bit. All the other boxes seem to behave okay. This particular box is tricky. 212.50.134.60 11:21, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I need help
editHi there! I have tried hard to obtain some information on a WWII item we found in eastern germany. As there were no or just negative replies, this is my last try. My friend runs a little museum in eastern germany where this item is displayed next to remainders of american, english, german and french aircrafts but he knows nothing about it. The only thing I was able to find out is that this item is definitely of american origin (confirmed by the royal air-force museum). So I am going to post the picture here and I hope that someone can help me or knows somebody who can. Maybe you can also redirect me to a better place to post this request....I would appreciate your advice! Thanks in advance! 164.77.50.5 (talk) 22:34, 18 February 2008
TAIC Report No.17, Nov 1944
editThe assertion that the Hellcat could beat the Zero in low speed is a very suspicious claim. Even the the TAIC Report have noticed: "The Zeke 52 was greatly superior to the F6F-5 in slow speed turn at low and medium altitudes, its advantage decreasing to about parity at 30,000 feet. In slow speed turns it could gains one turn in three and one-half at 10,000 feet." And recommend not to dog-fight or the attempt to outmaneuver it. Regards Bouquey (talk) 03:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, there is no source that can really support this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.11.3.98 (talk) 15:02, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
True losses underrated.
edit178 losses was, AFAIK, the figure for the Wildcat lost in combat only until the end of 1943 vs about 900 kill claimed, and NOT for all the war.
Apart this, the amount of airplanes lost to fire or destroyed at the ground is ridicolously low. Just think to the examples bombed at Henderson Field, the ones lost with Lexington, Hornet, Yorktown, Wasp and some other ships. Cleary, this is an information partially and highly biased, even if the last FM-2 Wildcat had an excellent kill-loss ratio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.11.3.98 (talk) 15:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)