Talk:Women's Super League

(Redirected from Talk:FA WSL)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Snowflake91 in topic Chelsea champions?

Proposed Mergers

edit

I'm closing this as not merged due to 1 negative response and a lack of subsequent discussion. --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 15:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with FA WSL 1

edit

Articles all have similar contents. 333-blue 01:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with FA WSL 2

edit

Articles all have similar contents. 333-blue 01:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FA WSL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 10 April 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved.(non-admin closure) Kostas20142 (talk) 13:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply



FA WSLFA Women's Super League – As per WP:NCA, We don't normally title articles using acronyms unless that name is overwhelmingly used for the subject. In this case, while the name is often referred to as the WSL, the full name is also commonly used, including in the competition's own logo, as can be seen in its infobox. It is also common in media usage, e.g. by the BBC here. By way of comparison, we have articles at FA Women's Premier League not FA WPL, English Football League not EFL, Scottish Professional Football League not SPFL etc. "FA" can stay abbreviated, as it's an additional descriptor rather than a main part of the competition's name, and "Football Association" in full isn't regular usage here. Jellyman (talk) 07:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Chelsea champions?

edit

I wonder if Chelsea should be listed under Champions, and equally Everton in the WSL 2 section. The spring series is no full season, and the way i remember always called one off tournament. No relegation was used/no places for the Champions League awarded and I don't think Chelsea are English champion by winnign the Spring series. -Koppapa (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

They are called "champions" on official competition website in the match report, and also received a trophy, so it should be listed somewhere in the article, maybe a note should be included next to "2017" in the table with an explanation about spring series. Snowflake91 (talk) 11:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Ok, they are champions of the spring series, sure. fawsl.com wording is "champions of inaugural spring series". A headnote would be good, because its not a wsl 1 championship (=english championship like the other in the table). A seperate section could work too. -Koppapa (talk) 12:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
I believe the 2017 title should be included, as the WSL note it on their list of top flight championships:
https://twitter.com/BarclaysWSL/status/1662851977322045441?t=cd8hD0SiZj6HVkYHrpUbvg&s=19.
The WSL also include it on their website top flight seasonal tables:
https://womenscompetitions.thefa.com/en/League-Tables/League-tables. 2.30.148.160 (talk) 05:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
And I can find you at least two tweets from that same WSL Twitter source, where they didn't count the 2017 series among the titles, the sources are inconsistent. Just refer to the worldfootball and RSSSF, which are very reliable sources, and none of them counts it. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:13, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FA Women's Super League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Women's Super League (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 10 June 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 07:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


FA Women's Super LeagueWomen's Super League – Under the new rebrand, "The FA" has been dropped from the league name as part of the long term strategy for the league to be under new ownership in the future. Per release Hjk1106 (talk) 15:12, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Support - I think that will be the new WP:COMMONNAME by the looks of it. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Support per official source, and this can be moved right away since its not controversial. Snowflake91 (talk) 15:26, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I tried to but I got an error message: "The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid." Hjk1106 (talk) 18:26, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
In that case you can list it at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Uncontroversial technical requests if the move is obviously uncontroversial, like the change of the name of the competition, and it will get moved by admin. Snowflake91 (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. Seany91 (talk) 12:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.