Talk:Regulations on children's television programming in the United States

suggestions from the mentor

edit
  1. Have a history/background section. This can explain the history of children's programming regulation before FCC came into the picture
  2. Organise various regulations chronologically - start with the oldest and proceed to the newest.
  3. For each regulation/act prominent cases, litigation, rulings, controversies and criticism can be added

--Sodabottle (talk) 09:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

more suggestions

edit

Hello mentees,

1) wikilinking - After the text is done, please add internal links to other wikipedia articles for terms like US Congress, Supreme Court, The Jetsons, etc (but not to common terms like Radio, Television)--Sodabottle (talk) 19:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

2) photos/illustrations - This article can do with some images. If you can get hold of any photos of FCC hearings on children's programming (copyright has to be checked - if it is the work of federal govt, it is in public domain, else we have to see if it can used with a fair use rationale) it would be nice--Sodabottle (talk) 19:38, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FCC regulations on children's programming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FCC regulations on children's programming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merger

edit

I rewrote this article, incorporating new, sourced text and merged content from Children's Television Act and E/I. This revision is more comprehensive and filled with less trivia. ViperSnake151  Talk  03:26, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bolding "educational and informative"

edit

I accidentally hit the Enter key rather than the Shift key while typing my edit summary for reverting the last edit, so here's what I was trying to type since I can't edit an edit summary: "Please note that while "E/I" is already bolded in the article, nowhere is the phrase "educational and informative" bolded, of which phrase "E/I" is the abbreviation. Matt Gies (talk) 20:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merge E/I

edit

My unilateral and BOLD merge was unilaterally undone by @Mrschimpf: due to an apparent need for consensus. The articles are redundant; E/I is flimsy and full of OR and needs more sourcing. This article expresses the entire concept with adequate sourcing and less OR. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:45, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Per-week"

edit

What's with the hyphen in this throughout? 173.90.75.20 (talk) 01:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

edit

  This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Michigan State University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply