This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am producing a detailed report on FM Rail for a financial institution and have found this article very interesting. It has helped to fill in the background details I could not find elsewhere. However, I do have a number of queries and would like to get in contact with 'Artdoyle'. Any ideas?? Adrian DavisAdraindavis (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Image overlaps table in FireFox. Andy Mabbett 15:37, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Artdoyle's extra bit on Merlin is interesting. After the merger it was clear that things were getting a bit smelly and nobody (with a few honourable exceptions) seemed capable of stopping the rot. There is a lot more that everybody inside the comppay knows that can be added but it might sound like gossiping. Any thoughts anybody? Litchurch Lad 01:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ha Ha! Yes you're right. Wikipedia is not for publishing original research, but there is room for current events. If you were (or we were) eye witnesses to some major event our observations, reported from a neutral pont of view (of course) would be suitable for inclusion. Gossip is a non-neutral point of view. Neutral reporting is acceptable. Artdoyle 12:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
I've split the FM Rail Ltd bit into 2, so that the bit about going bust can be documented separately from what FM was up to with its business. Artdoyle 12:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)