Talk:Falcon (series)

(Redirected from Talk:Falcon (video game series))
Latest comment: 2 years ago by JimmyBlackwing in topic Source

Fair use rationale for Image:ST Falcon.png

edit
 

Image:ST Falcon.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

It still has future

edit

Free Falcon 5.0 is now in beta2 level testing, but it is extremely buggy at the moment nad needs a lot of fixing before repairs. 82.131.210.162 (talk) 11:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Split

edit

I am opposed to splitting this article at this time. Neither of the sections that are proposed to split are independently notable (according to the existing article). The quality of the existing article is very poor. This should be corrected before considering a split. Op47 (talk) 19:01, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Since this comment, material has been added that makes pretty clear that at the very least, Falcon 3.0 should be broken out. --SubSeven (talk) 22:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Source

edit

JimmyBlackwing (talk) 03:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply