Talk:February 2007 North American blizzard

(Redirected from Talk:February 2007 North America blizzard)
Latest comment: 10 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleFebruary 2007 North American blizzard was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 11, 2007Good article nomineeListed
March 16, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
December 26, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on February 15, 2007.
Current status: Delisted good article

Has the storm abated?

edit

This article is misleading as the infobox suggests under the dissipation heading that the storm is ongoing, yet the main paragraph that it states that it was a storm? Which tense is correct?

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on February 2007 North American blizzard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on February 2007 North American blizzard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

GAR

edit

There are a lot of cntags. I think it should be GAR’d. 108.58.27.76 (talk) 21:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

This 2007 listing contains significant uncited material, violating GA criterion 2b). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. Dead links have become a major problem since the NWS forecast offices changed their links. News reports that are not archived have the same problem as well. ChessEric 20:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.