Talk:Fedora Linux
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fedora Linux article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2019, 2021Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fedora Linux was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Rawhide_(computing) was copied or moved into Fedora Linux#Rawhide with this edit on 09:05, 7 December 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Problems
editBecause the Wikipedia article looks like subjective marketing material there should objectively be "problems" chapter too. For example clearly describing that one should use only the latest version because earlier versions will be unsupported, and if suddenly later on supported then you'll end up upgrading anyway. Due to simple facts like kernel is compiled using gcc version which is not available when you need to compile modules.
Naturally clear statement facts and no whining but please write objectively. seen engineer pornography enough. //arl — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.157.84.67 (talk • contribs)
Change name from "Fedora" to "Fedora Linux"
editThe Fedora project has chosen to change the names they use to refer to the Linux distribution and the project. They now refer to the actual distribution as "Fedora Linux" and the project as a whole as "Fedora".
The issue tracker: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2588
The approval: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JPVDG4SQOBLF6HTLHXKIAXWH4QOHVSH7/
The commit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release/pull-request/181 Qx3Jw (talk) 23:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
"Fedora Linux" listed at Redirects for discussion
editA discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fedora Linux. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 28#Fedora Linux until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
user:Heikkikoskinen's edits
editHeikkikoskinen (talk · contribs) is a new Finnish user that has been registered on 15 January 2022 (6 days ago)(Special:CentralAuth/Heikkikoskinen) and has made many minor and major edits in many pages, I ask other editors to check its edits, because some parts of them are wrong, for example someone please check out "https://fedoralinux.org" because I can't access it from my location (Iran) and searching the Google shows nothing for it, I also ask someone (user:Ahunt for example) to revert its last edits in this article to the last revision by me because I don't want to do edit warring and the user hasn't understand and answer to these notes, thanks. -- FæɹHaad (talk) 15:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. I have reviewed @Heikkikoskinen:'s edits and reverted them. I can't access https://fedoralinux.org either as it is flagged as a security issue. https://getfedora.org is still the current project website. This user seem to be here to promote Fedora and especially Rocky Linux and his edits are overall WP:PROMOTIONAL and non-constructive. I have also warned him for a very obvious WP:COI. - Ahunt (talk) 15:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Major edit on lead
editThe lead read like promotional material with a lot of secondary information clutter. I made it more compact through several edits. Comments are welcome. Nxavar (talk) 12:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC)