Talk:10 Years (band)

Plural?

Why is the term 10 Years treated as a plural noun? Refering to the singular band, it should not be so- consequently, i believe that all the verbs should appropriately be changed to apply to the singular form (e.g. Are -> is, were -> was, etc etc). If someone can explain why the band's name is treated as plural, that will suffice, assuming the reason is sound. 24.219.113.171 15:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 10 Years was the length of time the members had dreamed of lasting when they first formed, As announced at the "Feeding the Wolves" premier show in Knoxville, TN when they met their goal. So... plural because they are referring to more than one year, noun because as a band they fit into the person place thing or idea criteria76.123.249.100 (talk) 04:35, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

singles

was seasons to cycle really a single??? i don't think so, can someone change the singles back to the way it was? i'm not that good with coding... Itachi1452 16:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

"The vocals of Jesse Hasek exquisitely display the intricate nuances and styles"

This is absurd. Wikipedia is about objective information, not overwritten, masturbatory, self-congratulating marketing copy.

I agree with you! I tried to remove those descriptions, but someone reverted it back! GAY!

please sign your comments. but yeah...i know it's sourced, but seems a little unnecessary. it's like saying in a bio of someone that that person molested dogs or something just out of the blue. Itachi1452 23:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Image

I have now tagged the image that is currently being used for the infobox as missing copyright information. However, from what I can tell, the image is a copyrighted by 10yearsfans.net. If someone could upload their own photograph that they release the rights to, than that would be the best option. Otherwise, a more free alternative needs to be found. See WP:IUP for more information. —Akrabbim^talk 02:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Rare and Live Tracks

Was this an official album? Looks suspicuously like some kind of bootleg to me. Rehevkor (talk) 02:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

So Long, Good-bye

Despite being added on 10 Years' Myspace music player, this has not been confirmed to be the next single. According to the band, the choices have been narrowed to Russian Roulette, Daydreamer, Actions & Motives, and Drug of Choice.The Tanker (talk) 01:07, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

---If you check their blog, they announced it was the single... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thepatman0 (talk • contribs) 02:45, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Brandon Estelle

So, can someone define, with a source, his official role in the band? People keep on changing it endlessly, and it'd be nice if we could have an official stance to refer people to on the discussion page.

From what I can gather, it looks like he's merely a touring musician who joined up with the band this year. Is this correct? Sergecross73 msg me 13:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Genre

10 years isn't all alternative metal, they have many songs that are considered "art rock", "progressive rock", and "progressive metal". Their main influences include Tool, and they sound A LOT like them. I think they should also be labeled as progressive rock, progressive metal, art rock, and post-grunge, not just alternative metal. 5:41, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

Alternative metal is the only genre here because it's the only sourced genre, you can go ahead and add any of those genres as long as you have a citation for them. I honestly don't see anything that progressive about this band, they sound mainly like Chevelle, Earshot, Breaking Benjamin and all those Tool like modern rock bands. Also if you check the alternative metal article you'll see "progressive rock" is listed as just one of the many possible influences. I call the big one bitey 00:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 12:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

---

10 Years → 10 Years (band) – Ambiguous generic name for this little-known band; there are strong contenders as primary topic, such as decade, 10 Years (film), 10 Years (Armin van Buuren album), or 10 Years (Banco de Gaia album)  Ohc ^¡digame!_{¿que pasa?} 03:20, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 10 Years (disambiguation) → 10 Years or 10 years

Survey

• Support too generic even with capital Y, and not primary topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support, is not WP:PRIMARYTOPIC even if you concede capitalization as a WP:NATURAL disambiguator. Red Slash 21:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support, though I take issue with nom's concept of "strong contenders as primary topic" for a term that clearly has no primary topic. Dicklyon (talk) 04:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support band disambiguation for sure, uncertain about best usage of "10 Years". The film seems like a decent candidate for primary topic going by pageviews. I seriously doubt that many people are looking for "decade" when they intentionally type in "10 Years" with a capital "Y". Dohn joe (talk) 17:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support, for the reasons already voiced. ╠╣uw [talk] 01:03, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support per above. The capital is not sufficient to disambiguate between "10 Years" and "10 years", what the primary topic is for this phrase is a discussion for another venue - although surely it should be "decade" before any band or film. Яehevkor ✉ 11:42, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Band membership

It doesn't appear anyone maintains this article anymore, so I don't know if I'll get any response, but I'll leave this here regardless. Any idea on how to classify Vodinh's membership for the band? The band's new statement talks about how Vodinh is returning for their 8th studio album (How to Live) As Ghosts, and how happy Hasek was to be working with him again (Source.) However, he appears to be credited as a band member for their prior album. (Source.)

So did he actually leave or what? I've read stuff about the fact that he "just quit touring" for a bit, but only as unsourced prose, not in any sources, and even if that was the case, it wouldn't make sense for Hasek to have said how much better it was working with him if he never stopped working with him on albums? Sergecross73 msg me 17:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Update: Another source says Vodinh left in 2013. (Source.) So that's probably it. Leaving here for future reference though. Sergecross73 msg me 17:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Found a reference to add later

Found a reference about the making of the Division album that could be interesting. It may be better suited on the Wikipedia page about the album itself (Division (10 Years album)) but I'll post it here regardless. I may come back to this page later to add the info from this reference, but if I forget, at least it's posted here so hopefully someone else can do it!

https://www.blabbermouth.net/news/years-drummer-talks-about-making-of-division/

Thank you, JaykeBird (talk) 00:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

"10 Years (band) (redirect)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 10 Years (band) (redirect). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 6#10 Years (band) (redirect) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)