Talk:Graham Island (Mediterranean Sea)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GAreview.21:34, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

GA reveiw

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A interesting article, well illustrated.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   A wider range of sources would be useful.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   The problems raised in the GA Reassessment of October 2008 appear to have been satisfactorily addressed.

I'm (re-)awarding this article GA-status.Pyrotec (talk) 10:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)