Talk:Fiat Bravo and Brava
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fiat Bravo and Brava article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis article, if you don't mind me saying so, is in a frankly horrific state.
I shall endeavour to source some better pictures for the article or obtain them myself, as the current ones are a bit patchy. I think an updated infobox is in order aswell...
It seems that as the Marea article has improved, this has gone steadily downhill...Abarthaddict 21:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
The 1.6SX mentioned under the Brazillian engines was definitely available outside the home market -- I have one! Gavinayling (talk) 08:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Picture Naming
editIt appears that the "Fiat Bravo MK2" picture is actually a Brava; acc'ding to the intro a Bravo has 3 doors. The car pictured has 5 (like the Brava). Does anyone know if this is, in fact, a Bravo? If you do, please correct the caption. Thanks.
The Mk2 is indeed a Bravo. Fiat have opted for a single name for the model and chose Bravo for it over Brava. Best site for info on the mk2 Bravo is at http://www.fiat.co.uk/Showroom/#showroom/bravo . Although in Australia it will be known as Ritmo(can be confirmed on fiat australia website). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.222.131 (talk) 04:25, August 24, 2007 (UTC)
- I do not think the new bravo should be in this pag. It is a completely different car, and not a mark 2 variant of the original Bravo. Onesti (talk) 10:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
= I believe the model listed as "1368 cc" is a 2007 model and has been put on this page by mistake. Also id agree this page is to a poor standard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.45.18.220 (talk) 20:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Mk1 is 1995 to 1999. Mk2 is 1999 to 2001. The 2007 Bravo can be considered Mk3, people keep making this mistake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.45.18.220 (talk) 20:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Brava - not adequately discussed
editThe 1979, 1980 Brava sold in the USA was a refined 131. The slightly sexier looks and styling deserve photos, of which are online in spades. The DOHC, interior, suspension and 5 speed grear box were all notable niceties that should not be omitted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.163.106.71 (talk) 12:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fiat Bravo and Brava. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140117191846/http://www.quicks.co.uk/news/2013/rewind-1996-fiat-bravo-brava/ to http://www.quicks.co.uk/news/2013/rewind-1996-fiat-bravo-brava/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)