Talk:Fine-tuned universe
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fine-tuned universe article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Puddle thinking page were merged into Fine-tuned universe on 29 January 2010. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Article needs a history section
editI was brought here from the page for Averroes, who argued for a fine tuned universe based on the properties of Earth, as a teleologic proof of God. (Plenty of water, rivers, temperature, etc.) Others in the past have used the physical chemistry of water as evidence. (High melting point, freezing point, and the density of ice, as well as its overall abundance.)
On the Habitability of Universes without Stable Deuterium
editI got reverted, so I am noting it here. On the Habitability of Universes without Stable Deuterium shows complex chemistry is possible, even if a proton could not bond to a neutron. I assume it was considered "original research" because it is a primary source. I think the point is important, so please help finding the appropriate secondary source. Thanks! Sanxiyn (talk) 09:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Epsilon
editIsn't Epsilon actually the fine-structure constant at the helium fusion part? --Conspiration 11:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Merger proposal Fine-tuning (physics)
editI propose we should merge the Fine-tuning (physics) article into this one. Uwsi (talk) 13:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
"Puddle thinking" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Puddle thinking has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 26 § Puddle thinking until a consensus is reached. Tea2min (talk) 09:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)