Talk:Firepower (album)
(Redirected from Talk:Firepower (Judas Priest album))
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Dreamy Jazz in topic Requested move 11 December 2018
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Parkinson's
editTipton has Parkinson's? Why isn't that fact in the article, with proper context? What does that Sneap guy have to do with that? Why do we get announcements and notifications and responses and modified responses, but not the actual facts? Drmies (talk) 01:22, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 11 December 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move, therefore, moved. Moved per WP:ALBUMDAB. (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 22:59, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Firepower (Judas Priest album) → Firepower (album) – Only album called "Firepower" with an article. EditAvenger (talk) 14:53, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - "with an article" is not the standard we use, but rather
subject covered by Wikipedia, either as the main topic of an article, or as a subtopic covered by an article in addition to the article's main topic
" (from Wikipedia:Disambiguation). Since there are definitely other albums (and several singles) listed at Firepower (disambiguation), and there may be an element of WP:RECENTISM at play here, its better to preserve the clear title we already have. -- Netoholic @ 19:22, 11 December 2018 (UTC)- Perhaps unfortunately, that is the rule that has recently been applied for albums and songs. See WP:PDAB § Song and album articles with no other standalone article, which discusses this RFC concluded in June 2016. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- An RFC held within the narrow context of a single topic area cannot determine anything except unreliable WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. Wikipedia:Disambiguation documents how to handle incomplete disambiguation, suggesting that where
Title (album)
would still be ambiguous based upon coverage, its should be redirected to the DAB page and specific albums be named more precisely. -- Netoholic @ 03:10, 12 December 2018 (UTC)- I agree with you. Personally, I don't think the lack of a stand-alone article means anything regarding the notability or primary status of the topic, and I don't think we should be incentivizing the creation of new articles simply as a way to justify disambiguation. Note, however, that this convention has snuck its way into a footnote of WP:ALBUMDAB. —BarrelProof (talk) 04:42, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- An RFC held within the narrow context of a single topic area cannot determine anything except unreliable WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. Wikipedia:Disambiguation documents how to handle incomplete disambiguation, suggesting that where
- Perhaps unfortunately, that is the rule that has recently been applied for albums and songs. See WP:PDAB § Song and album articles with no other standalone article, which discusses this RFC concluded in June 2016. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support. Per WP:ALBUMDAB and the established consensus at the RFC, we do not include the artist name if there are no other articles on albums of the same name.--Cúchullain t/c 16:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support per WP:ALBUMDAB. (@Netoholic: For what it’s worth, if WP:ALBUMDAB wasn’t established, I’d agree with your "oppose" 100% since ... that’s the way it’s done almost everywhere else. Why this has to be an exception ... arg, but it is.) Steel1943 (talk) 19:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.