Talk:Sieges of Boulogne (1544–1546)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Proposed name change
editSiege of Boulogne (1544-1550). It was a single action of investment of a town and harbour by the English army, with varying degrees of resistance from the French over six years of interrupted continuous duration.Unoquha (talk) 15:39, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that I would characterize it as a single action—we're still talking about three (four?) separate sieges, spanning several wars and intervening peace treaties—but I agree that clustering the entire series of sieges into a single article would probably make sense, given the relative brevity of the material we have and the similarities between the sieges. Kirill [talk] [prof] 20:02, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sieges of Boulogne (1544–46). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120308042034/http://www.etsu.edu/cas/history/documents/ponet.htm to http://www.etsu.edu/cas/history/documents/ponet.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)