Talk:Flat-headed cat

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Genus is contradictory

The main text suggests a different genus to the info box. If there's something fun going on here (eg controversy, reclassification), it should be explained. Dunno the answer myself 81.187.202.205 (talk) 02:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

This cat truly is a member of Prionailurus, so I checked with MSW3. What the text means - but does not make clear - is that the original placement (19th cen.) of the F-H cat was in Felis, but all recent placements have been in Prionailurus. I've made the text reflect this. Nice catch. Seduisant (talk) 03:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Flat headed cat.jpg

Image:Flat headed cat.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Project Class B

I went ahead and rated this article as Project Class B - it's a pretty good, well-referenced, and quite thorough treatment of a felid about which little is known; and it's doubtful much more could be added about this reclusive animal. If a picture could be found, it might cement this rating a bit more. If someone in the Wiki Cats project disagrees with this action, I'm certainly not inflexible. Seduisant (talk) 22:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

I agree with this. Because there are a number of reliable resources and considering how understudied the species is. This article has come a long way.Mcelite (talk) 23:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Page views

Leo1pard (talk) 15:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)