Talk:Florence Chadwick

Why the page move?

Why was this page moved from Florence Chadwick, which was perfectly fine, to Florence May Chadwick? She wasn't known by her full name, so there seems no rationale for this move. It certainly wasn't discussed. It is now being discussed. -- JackofOz (talk) 11:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Resolved below. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 22:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Why no photo?

How come there is no photo of Florence Chadwick?--Splashen (talk) 22:17, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. DrKiernan (talk) 15:50, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

---

Florence May Chadwick → Florence Chadwick – She is universally known as Florence Chadwick and is so named in virtually every reference. This article was originally (2004) named Florence Chadwick. In 2009 the article was moved to Florence May Chadwick without explanation or discussion; a comment on the talk page shows that there were objections, but they came too late since the article was already moved. The middle name is not needed for disambiguation since there is no other Florence Chadwick. Virtually every "what links here" link goes to the redirect page Florence Chadwick, not to this article Florence May Chadwick. I request that the redirect page Florence Chadwick be deleted so that this article can be moved back to that name. MelanieN (talk) 17:17, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

• Support for WP:CONCISENESS & WP:UNDABNESS. ;) DeistCosmos (talk) 21:22, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
• Support primarily per WP:COMMONNAME, but also for WP:UNDABNESS. In this case I don't think concision is a factor. It just happens to be that the more concise choice is also the one most commonly used - but if the longer one was more commonly used we would go with that. Conciseness normally only apples as a tie breaker - when there is no consensus about which of the two choices in question is favored by WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CRITERIA other than conciseness. --В²C ☎ 23:10, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Florence Chadwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140826113305/http://www.ishof.org/Honorees/70/70fchadwick.html to http://www.ishof.org/Honorees/70/70fchadwick.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 20 December 2017 (UTC)