Talk:Florissantia elegans
(Redirected from Talk:Florissantia (planthopper))
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Desertarun in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Florissantia elegans appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 14:54, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the fossil planthopper Florissantia elegans (illustration pictured) is only 12.5 mm (0.49 in) long? Source: "Scudder (1890) pg 294" (and biodiversitylibrary pdf)
- ALT1:... that the fossil planthopper Florissantia elegans (illustration pictured) was described in 1890 from only two fossils? Source: "Scudder (1890) pg 294" (and biodiversitylibrary pdf)
- Reviewed: Yonenaga's Atlantic spiny rat
Moved to mainspace by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 20:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC).
- Article is long enough (3693 characters), new enough (moved to mainspace on 11 June, nominated on the same day), and article is within policy
- Of the hooks, I find ALT1 a lot more interesting, as it's unusual. But both hooks are short enough, in the article, well cited and interesting enough. Up to promoter which one to use
- Image is freely licenced (PD), in the article, and will look okay at low resolution
- QPQ done
- Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)