Talk:Formula 3 Euro Series

Expansion

This article needs expansion, along the lines of the Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters page. Adrian M. H. 21:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorted now. Adrian M. H. 19:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Jamie Green's results

I originally listed 140 points and 5 poles for Jamie Green's championship season, based on data at Forix. I have since found two sets of data from http://www.formel3guide.com and Speedsport that contradict Forix and both agree on 139 points and 6 poles. I have amended the table accordingly. Adrian M. H. 19:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

On hold for GA

I have to say, I really did like the article. Can someone just source the remaining statements made in Background, Technical and Sporting Regulations, and Chassis and Engines? This branch of FIA racing is just such a "niche" element that a lot of the elements of this particular series might need the extra sourcing backup. I'll check back in a week or so and see how it's going. Theirishpianist 05:16, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Response: You'll need to be specific about which bits you think are not already sourced. I can at least confirm that notes 9 and 10 in the Regs section cover all the info between them and the previous ref. Adrian M. H. 15:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

These are the specific statements I'd like to see sourced:

• "In 1976, the Cup evolved into the European F3 Championship and the calendar doubled in length to incorporate ten rounds. The first title winner in the new format was Riccardo Patrese. The series ran continuously in this format until 1984. The European Cup returned from 1985 to 1990 as a one-off special event not dissimilar to the Macau Grand Prix."
• "From 1999 to 2002, the European Cup name was re-used to promote the Grand Prix de Pau when that event had returned to Formula Three regulations, at which time it was included as a round of the French F3 Championship until the latter's demise."
• "When the series began, all entrants took a conservative approach to their choice of chassis supplier and opted for the established Dallara F302/F303. Alternative chassis have been tested and/or raced on occasions, but have failed to get established in the face of Dallara's dominance."

I double-checked the entries in Technical and Sporting Regulations and those actually do look good. If you can source those three statements that's all I'll need. Theirishpianist 18:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I have added sources where possible, and commented out statements for which I haven't been able to find good sources (it's a while since this article was written!). I have rephrased the sentence about alternative chassis failing to become established, but it is too general to be sourced directly. It is explained by the following paragraph, which is sourced. I have removed the break between the two paragraphs to tie them together more clearly. Adrian M. H. 23:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I like it. One more question...is there any available information on the interim period from 1984-2003? Specifically, the period between 1991 and 1998 where the F3 European Cup was not awarded? More curiosity than anything but I thought I'd ask. Theirishpianist 00:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

The multi-round championship ended in 1984 and wasn't replaced by an equivalent. I'm not sure why. Possibly because its last few champions didn't exactly impress in F1. There was just the usual one-off specials at Pau in France and Zandvoort in Holland (the Marlboro Masters), plus two more in Asia (Korea and Macau). The Pau Grand Prix ran to F3000 regs in the 1990s, then got rebranded as a European Cup when it went back to F3 regs as a round of the French Championship, but the name was misleading, as little had changed. There was also a short-lived Central European Championship around the turn of the millenium, but that was just a few events in the Czech Republic and Poland, and barely registered on anyone's radar. Adrian M. H. 15:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Nice job, everyone. I enjoyed this article and thought it was quite well done. Just be sure to keep up with the latest technical advancements, and keep the league tables accurate as the season progresses. Theirishpianist 05:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I strongly recommend that the inline citations are changed to the [[WP:CITET] format. If this article comes up for a GA review, then this may be commented on. - Shudda ^talk 01:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I am not sure what you mean? It is my understanding - I have been told this by other editors - that the notes layout with the small numbers is the correct system. Surely the term "inline" refers to website links that are represented thus: 1 Which is not used in this article. I spent a lot of time converting them all with templates prior to nominating the article. If, by "[[WP:CITET]", you mean WP:CITE, I have read it. Adrian M. H. 15:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Lots more information can be included in the refs. If you looks at the web and news templates of WP:CITET they have something along the lines of {{cite web| url= |publisher= |title= |date= |accessdate= |last= |first=}}. Although it says there are neither encouraged or discouraged, they are a really good format to use, gives lots of info, rather then just url, title and accessdate. - Shudda ^talk 22:38, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I used the "cite web" template, but you can't include information if it is not available or doesn't apply. It is quite rare to find author credits for motorsport articles, for example. I can appreciate your point, but I have sought (and worked hard) to include all available information. Adrian M. H. 23:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Not all avaliable information is there, take for example ref 7. Using citet it reads:

• "Increased co-operation between DTM & Euro F3". motorsport.com. 2003-11-28. Retrieved 2007-02-02. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Better don't you think? I'm not trying to be critical, just giving a suggestion to improve the article. Shudda ^talk 02:01, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I have posted a question on your talk page, as it's a more general query. Regards, Adrian M. H. 18:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Correct order??

Just watch every single one of the tables of champions (F1, F2, F3000, GP2)... and you will see the correct order.Kyosukekun 04:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

To which printed publication(s) do you refer? They are our guide and proper convention dictates that dated tabular information of motorsport championships should be listed in "CV" order. Adrian M. H. 09:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm refering to wikipedia, to be consistent I think all the tables of champions of motor sport(formula racing, at least) might look in the same way.Kyosukekun 03:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

That is not quite how this works. We let respected outside sources (both inside and outside the subject's field of expertise) influence our style, just as the Chicago MoS influences us. Therefor we encourage the use of reverse chronology, which serves to present the most prescient information first. Adrian M. H. 08:08, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Eurof3logo.gif

Image:Eurof3logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Formula Three Euroseries/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

I will do a GA Reassessment on this article as part of the GA Sweeps project. H1nkles (talk) 16:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the time spent working on an article about F3 racing. Since the F1 boys get all the glory it's gratifying to see work done to promote those that toil in the minor leagues. Keep up the good work.

That said there are some signficant issues with this article when it is put up against the GA Criteria:

• It is very dated. The newest information is from 2007. This needs to be addressed throughout the article. That speaks to the comprehensive requirement.
• The Driver and Teams section is completely uncited and seems to cut off at the end of the last paragraph with a semi colon. Is there more to add here that didn't get added? Also the first sentence in this section is very vague, it doesn't help the reader understand why it is a multi-nationals entry list. What is the F3 profile referred to here?
• Citing. I added a few tags to the article but many more could have been added. The Champions table needs to be cited, the Specifications section is uncited. The 2004 season is uncited.
• The lead is inadequate. Per WP:Lead the lead is to be a summary of every point made in the article. The lead in this article is missing the history of F3, the venues, along with some of the technical information.
• Per WP:Units the KM measurements should have the (miles) conversion in parentheses.
• The reference section is not correctly formatted. Each reference should at least have the name, publisher, and accessdate. Ref 27 has a publisher, the rest do not. Also important inclusions are the work (if it is taken from a journal, newspaper or magazine), date of the article, and author if one exists. Also I find 13 dead or outdated links, almost half of the reference section is dead. That has to be addressed. Here are the suspect references: 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26. Now my checklinks tool has had some problems lately so if some of these links are ok then I apologize.
• All of these issues are important to keeping the article at GA quality. I will put the article on hold for a week pending work, and notify the interested editors and projects. H1nkles (talk) 17:37, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Since no work has been done on this review I will delist. H1nkles (talk) 02:54, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Name

Throughout Wikipedia the series is referred to as the Formula Three Euroseries, but having done some research the name should be Formula 3 Euro Series. Examples of this include http://www.f3euroseries.com/, Autosport and FIA. I am proposing that we change this on Wikipedia. - mspete93 10:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Support. DH85868993 (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I agree too. Has that always been its name in fact? Officially Mr X (talk) 13:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

The Google test gives ten times more "Formula 3 Euroseries" than "Formula 3 Euro Series", same with "Formel".

Championship seasons

Last five seasons only have a link. Since the table of champions also has these links maybe this section should be deleted? --Falcadore (talk) 01:51, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Formula 3 Euro Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070625012534/http://www.f1prospects.com/2006/04/german_f3_a_rec.html to http://www.f1prospects.com/2006/04/german_f3_a_rec.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Formula 3 Euro Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930011216/http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=114401&FS=EUROF3 to http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=114401&FS=EUROF3
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070330231939/http://www.fia.com/resources/documents/510462567__AppJ_Art_275.pdf to http://www.fia.com/resources/documents/510462567__AppJ_Art_275.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928080916/http://www.f1prospects.com/2005/12/f3_euroseries_c.html to http://www.f1prospects.com/2005/12/f3_euroseries_c.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927190346/http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=114404&FS=EUROF3 to http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=114404&FS=EUROF3
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928080934/http://www.f1prospects.com/2006/03/f3_euro_series__7.html to http://www.f1prospects.com/2006/03/f3_euro_series__7.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928081005/http://www.f1prospects.com/2006/03/f3_euro_series__10.html to http://www.f1prospects.com/2006/03/f3_euro_series__10.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090107013815/http://f3euroseries.com/ to http://www.f3euroseries.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090107013815/http://f3euroseries.com/ to http://www.f3euroseries.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

2019?

F3 Euro Series 2019 revival plan presented to Formula 3 teams. --Pelmeen10 (talk) 22:03, 26 August 2018 (UTC)